Fidelity scales can be used by many different groups, including
(1) agencies responsible for financing programs, such as the state vocational
rehabilitation agency, the state Medicaid office, and the state mental health
agency;
(2) center directors for mental health centers;
(3) program leaders responsible for the supervision and management of a program,
(4) practitioners responsible for implementing a practice, and
(5) consumers and family members, who are recipients of services.
There are many different uses for fidelity scales, which can
be illustrated by noting what happens in the absence of fidelity scales or their
equivalent. In the case of funding agencies, when administrators lack clear
standards or criteria for what constitutes an high fidelity program, the funding
agencies don’t have a systematic way to gauge program adequacy. A fidelity
scale can help define the standards.
Similarly, when service agencies lack clear criteria for program implementation,
they may think they are implementing a practice when they aren’t. This
is in fact a very common phenomenon. Research has shown that without rigorous
training, staff tend to “fall back” on traditional practices. They
provide services that resemble what they have always done. In newly established
programs, staff are usually interested in doing the right thing. But without
clear guidelines and supervision, they often are confused about what they are
supposed to do. Use of a fidelity scale can provide guidelines about program
structure and practitioner performance.
Although at present fidelity scales rarely have been used by
consumer or family members, they could be used by them as well. Fidelity scales
could provide a framework for consumers in deciding which programs are most
likely to provide services that will assist the consumer in achieving a competitive
employment outcome.