Micheal C. Whitehill McCrone, Inc. Top three reasons for hiring persons with disabilities are a relatively unlimited job pool, a resource that is largely untapped particularly in our Maryland area. A second reason is that the desire to work and the job skills are generally compatible with our needs. And the third reason would be that to hire someone with disabilities would be that the types of jobs that we are seeing in the future are more likely to be suited to training and retrofits we'll see coming through division of rehabilitative services. Hiring persons with disabilities is the very reason we got into telecommuting in the first place. We have a very, very qualified employee who was trained by a division of rehabilitative services in computer aided drafting. This individual was a paraplegic and came to our work every single day on time, rain or shine in his own vehicle, however, it became inconvenient over the course of time because of some progressive issues with his vehicle and his health that he spent more time at home. We therefore developed a mechanism within the corporation to permit him to do the majority of his work off premises. Basically, that experience with that employee set up in our entire corporation a methodology to establish what we now call virtual team where employees with or without disabilities had access to telework and that's doing several things for us immediately. It reduced our physical plant need because we don't have to provide physical space for those employees on premises and it gave us a work pool that we never would have got had we not started telework for this disabled individual. That additional services comes from the fact that the majority of the well trained people we were recruiting did not want to leave their existing employers for money or signing bonuses they did want to move for a change in their lifestyle and telework is a significant lifestyle change for those people with appropriate behaviors. The same issues that arose for us in hiring persons with disabilities virtually followed along with the development of an off premise or virtual design teams. The person with a disability was at first had to integrate himself immediately into our workforce community, the fact was that he was diligent and in some cases too diligent, which made him the object of some concern for employees who weren't performing as well. Needless to say we have subsequently been able to chortle against this one individual using him as a benchmark. The second thing with telecommuting, the hardship we found there was if your going to do it for him because he has a disability why not do it for me and I don't have a disability and I've been working with you for a longer period of time. Sort of a why me type of behavior. We simply developed a corporate strategy that indicated that this is a much likely privilege, to drive in Maryland, it's a privilege to work in a telecommuting environment and it's not a right and we therefore established a series of guidelines and a series of behaviors so that individuals who were selected to work either remotely or who are hired to work remotely had adequate behaviors and relatively low social needs so that they didn't need the office environment constantly to survive. The difficulty of convincing supervisors to accept applicants with disabilities is a somewhat easier issue than it was perhaps four or five years ago because there aren't that many candidates out there and what we find is that the variety of mechanisms where by we come in contact with people with appropriate skill sets produces a very limited worker pool and therefore the more common complaint is why can't you find me somebody to help rather than this person isn't qualified or I don't like this person because I am assuming that the disability will cost us something in the end. So working that issue full circle, the employer when I look at my project manager I ask them very simply when they start to look at potential employees where else are you going to find them? and they are beginning to realize that employees that want to work aren't growing on any trees they grow in our company. We generally cross train all employees in all of our aspects of business, civil engineering, surveying and so forth so that any one individual has no ceiling and no immediate supervisor that he has to necessarily find away around or through in order to work himself up. So by knocking the corporate structure ladder on it's side so to speak all employees are allowed to percolate upward if that can happen in such a way that their merits as employees can be measured not against the bias or the longevity of some supervisor. So really the best way we found was simply to lay the structure on its side and let individuals proceed on the basis of performance. A second thing particularly with the employment of persons with disabilities the opportunities to grow and receive the same educational benefits, for us to guarantee the same opportunities for training, the same opportunities for varied work so they are not pigeon holed into sort of sub automation jobs allows them to proceed at the same level as everyone else. The second thing is to show no preference for the person with disability over the person with ability of the same job ability simply because that is a reverse preference if you will is debilitating to their worker relationship in house.