Print Friendly and PDF

Survey results from a national survey of community rehabilitation providers holding special wage certificates

by Katherine Inge, Paul Wehman, Grant Revell, Doug Erickson, Johon Butterworth, and Dana Gilmore

Available formats:    View full text PDF


Inge, K., Wehman, P., Revell, G., Erickson, D., Butterworth, J. & Gilmore, D. (2009). Survey results from a national survey of community rehabilitation providers holding special wage certificates. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 30(2), 67 - 85.

The purpose of this paper is to present the findings from a national survey of a random sample of community rehabilitation programs (CRPs) that hold Special Wage Certificates established under Section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. 214(c). The intent of the survey was to identify the types of services provided, the trends in the employment services, and the factors that were perceived as inhibiting and facilitating integrated employment outcomes. The survey results are categorized for this report in the following three areas: 1) characteristics of community rehabilitation programs, 2) organizational change trends, and 3) factors that influence the type of employment program utilized by consumers with disabilities.

Representative results from the survey are that overall, facility-based programs continue to be the predominant service provided by community rehabilitation programs holding 14(c) certificates. Of the 20,075 staff members identified as serving consumers, only 1,741 (8.7% are reported as working with individuals earning at least minimum wage. Although competitive employment and individual supported employment services among these CRPs are growing at a faster rate than other services, use of facility-based services continues to expand. Overall, the findings indicate that the organizations that provide daily services to those Americans with disabilities utilizing 14(c) certificates are continuing to predominately support facility-based work and non-work activities versus services leading to integrated employment outcomes.

 


Have a Question or Comment About This Article?

Your email address (required if you would like a reply):

Your comment:

In the text field beneath the following image, please type the characters you see in the image. This is to prevent automated scripts from submitting this form. The text is not case-sensitive.

Image text: